Shooting Clays

One of the changes I particularly enjoy, especially on a hot day when it’s tough to be comfortable at a shooting bench is shooting clays. It’s pretty cheap, and you can quickly amass a rolling collection of shotshells suitable for hunting (or busting clays). The going rate is $20 for a box of shells (100 shells) and $6 for a flight of clays. But, like any decent hunter, I’ve got four different brands of shotshells and four different sizes from 8 to 7. Generally shooting for me is cheap since I’ve just got disgusting piles of odds and ends, and the weapon investment only needs to happen once. Unlike rifles, it’s really hard to shoot out the barrel of a shotgun and generally the chokes die long before the barrel does. Unlike shotguns, rifles are only as good as you are. Your mileage may vary.

I’ve found that the local gun club is empty Sunday afternoons when people are generally sticking to Church. Since they don’t open until noon now (an entirely separate complaint), it’s good to know that there’s still time when you can get on the line. Maybe it’s the heat, but the place was a ghost town last time. We had our pick of the clay throwers. Jon brought his Remington 870 Murder Party Edition. Jon will probably kill me for this later, but I’m not impressed with it. Out of box it wouldn’t cycle a spent shell I cut the skirt off of, and the tolerances are so tight on the chamber that it will jam. I had to hammer it on the ground once to open the action. It may improve, but there’s little reason for all this on a shotgun. It’s not to say my Remington Spartan 320 – oops, IZHMASH Baikal IZ-27 – is perfect, but at least the tolerances are correct. Also whoever owned it before me did so with love, the wooden stock has pretty typical field wear but the bore is bright like mirrors. Anyway, I just enjoy clay shooting, and I think that instant feedback is well and good for developing skills. Next time I’m up there I plan on shooting the motorized traps for epic wins.

Obama and Philadelphia

I’m pretty sure he’s smoking crack. Someone has to be. Then again I never understood Bill Clinton either and thought the double-talk from him was just as bad. Couldn’t ever nail down an honest word from the guy. You might disagree with Bush’s policy, but it’s been a largely transparent presidency which is why no-one dare mention “impeachment” (except the UFO guy). Obama came to Philadelphia and I had plenty else to do (like shooting clays). John McCain has the lite version of the visit, but there’s much more to it. Both of the following can be found from the McCain page.

The Page reports:

He said that Philadelphia needs change. “We don’t have a choice but to win.”

Obama retold the story of an unemployed man who offered to buy Obama and Casey a beer during one of their stops on the Pennsylvania bus tour. “Bob and I were at a sports bar trying to catch a little bit of the game. A guy offered to buy us a beer. We already had a beer we drank but he offered to buy us one,” Obama said. The man could not afford gas to drive around looking for a new job.

OK seriously – Philadelphia has been a Democratic stronghold for the last 10 some years, I can’t imagine why keeping the Democratic leadership would make it less of a shithole. Or bring about change, since voting Democrat would simply be voting the status quo. And what’s a guy who can’t afford gas doing pissing his money away at a sports bar? Considering the fact that his next line was about a balanced budget, the irony abounds.

Obama wraps with:

“If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun,” Obama said. “Because from what I understand folks in Philly like a good brawl. I’ve seen Eagles fans.”

That’s right, it’s Philadelphia, it’s a violent shithole of Democratic leadership, thank you for your understanding. Please leave the state as fast as possible Sir.

So how does he really feel about guns? Politico answers:

Both versions of the 1996 questionnaires provide answers his presidential campaign disavows to questions about whether Obama supports capital punishment and state legislation to “ban the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns.”

He responded simply “No” and “Yes,” respectively, to those questions on both questionnaires.

Now it’s not to say that John McCain has the most squeaky clean record when it comes to gun control – he tried to close the “gun show loophole” (sales between private individuals are unregulated) and Arizona voters invited him out to the street to get shot. He took the clue and changed his course.

Frankly, it’s OK to be wrong. Bush admitted there was no “smoking gun” which is what we expected to find (there’s plenty of other reasons to hang Saddam) and apologized for it. McCain also apologized over his faux pas. Obama so far hasn’t apologized for anything and merely “clarified” his points. Thanks, we heard you the first time.